Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
73bdac0da2 test(points): cover soft delete, relinking, and the file sweep
Why:
- The failure modes worth testing are races, and they are cheap to force
  against the fake and expensive to observe anywhere else.

Changes:
- Unit tests for both boundaries, the repeat delete, a missing neighbour, the
  traversal property after several deletes, and — via a repository that bumps a
  rival's version before each apply — both the partial-apply repair and the
  unconvergent 409.
- One new shared contract scenario (a multi-point batch applies every patch,
  including nulling a pointer) so it runs against the fake and real Qdrant.
- HTTP tests against real Postgres and Qdrant for relinking, soft-not-hard
  delete, cross-tenant 404, and scope enforcement on both routes.
- create_source_file factory for tests addressing a file without uploading.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-22 17:12:56 +03:30
062fdd7ac1 refactor(test): share the Qdrant point-seeding helper
Why:
- The helper turning a SeedSpec into an upsertable ChunkPoint lived inside one
  integration test. A second suite now needs to seed real Qdrant the same way,
  and a copy would let the two drift.

Changes:
- Move `_chunk_point` into tests/support/point_contract.py as `chunk_point_for`,
  beside the `build_point` read model it derives its payload from.

Impact:
- Pure move. No behaviour change; enables the API suite that follows.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-22 15:08:25 +03:30
923ac8e5d6 test(points): hold the fake and the Qdrant adapter to one shared contract
Why:
- Two parallel test files let a fake drift more permissive than the store it
  stands in for, so unit tests stay green while production diverges. Plan 002
  Phase 1's exit criterion is precisely that the two agree.

Changes:
- One scenario suite in tests/support/point_contract.py, run against
  FakePointRepository (unit) and QdrantPointRepository (integration). A
  divergence fails one of the two runs rather than hiding.
- The fake models the behaviours services branch on: the implied is_active read
  filter, value-based cursor pagination, and a stale version guard that matches
  nothing rather than raising -- the no-op Qdrant's filtered set_payload actually
  has, and the reason a service must read back to know its write landed.
- Patched points are re-validated rather than model_copy'd, so the fake holds a
  datetime where a read from real Qdrant returns one.
- The seeded corpus gives each tenant its own file: point IDs derive from
  file_id plus chunk_index alone, so two tenants in one file would collide on a
  single ID and the fixture would assert an impossible state.

Impact:
- 15 scenarios pass against both implementations.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-22 13:09:50 +03:30