forked from Yara724/api
YARA-1209, YARA-1214
This commit is contained in:
@@ -8308,8 +8308,14 @@ export class ClaimRequestManagementService {
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// 4. Validate outer parts haven't been selected yet
|
||||
// 4. Validate outer parts haven't been selected yet.
|
||||
// For FILE_REVIEWER re-reviewing after a FileMaker rejection, the existing
|
||||
// selection from the prior cycle is intentionally overwritten — skip this
|
||||
// guard so the reviewer can update the damaged parts list.
|
||||
const isFileReviewerReselect =
|
||||
actor?.role === RoleEnum.FILE_REVIEWER;
|
||||
if (
|
||||
!isFileReviewerReselect &&
|
||||
claimCase.damage?.selectedParts &&
|
||||
claimCase.damage.selectedParts.length > 0
|
||||
) {
|
||||
@@ -11161,10 +11167,21 @@ export class ClaimRequestManagementService {
|
||||
// USER_SUBMISSION_COMPLETE: can occur when documents were uploaded via a
|
||||
// non-V3 path (e.g. generic v2 endpoint). Safe to advance as long as
|
||||
// accident fields are set (checked just below).
|
||||
// EXPERT_REVIEWING + EXPERT_DAMAGE_ASSESSMENT: FileReviewer re-entering
|
||||
// after a FileMaker rejection. The claim was locked back to
|
||||
// EXPERT_REVIEWING by the reviewer's lock call; the document phase was
|
||||
// already completed in the prior cycle so it's safe to advance directly
|
||||
// to part selection.
|
||||
const isFileReviewerReentry =
|
||||
claimCase.status === ClaimCaseStatus.EXPERT_REVIEWING &&
|
||||
step === ClaimWorkflowStep.EXPERT_DAMAGE_ASSESSMENT &&
|
||||
(blame as any)?.isMadeByFileMaker === true;
|
||||
|
||||
const canAdvance =
|
||||
step === ClaimWorkflowStep.UPLOAD_REQUIRED_DOCUMENTS ||
|
||||
step === ClaimWorkflowStep.USER_SUBMISSION_COMPLETE ||
|
||||
claimCase.status === ClaimCaseStatus.WAITING_FOR_FILE_REVIEWER;
|
||||
claimCase.status === ClaimCaseStatus.WAITING_FOR_FILE_REVIEWER ||
|
||||
isFileReviewerReentry;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!canAdvance) {
|
||||
throw new BadRequestException(
|
||||
@@ -11574,9 +11591,19 @@ export class ClaimRequestManagementService {
|
||||
throw new BadRequestException("Video file is required.");
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (claimCase.media?.videoCaptureId) {
|
||||
throw new ConflictException(
|
||||
"A walk-around video has already been uploaded for this claim.",
|
||||
);
|
||||
// FILE_REVIEWER re-reviewing after a FileMaker rejection: allow replacing
|
||||
// the previous walk-around video by clearing the stale id first so that
|
||||
// setVideoCaptureV2's own conflict check doesn't block the upload.
|
||||
if (actor?.role === RoleEnum.FILE_REVIEWER) {
|
||||
await this.claimCaseDbService.findByIdAndUpdate(claimRequestId, {
|
||||
$unset: { "media.videoCaptureId": "" },
|
||||
});
|
||||
claimCase.media = { ...(claimCase.media ?? {}), videoCaptureId: undefined } as any;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
throw new ConflictException(
|
||||
"A walk-around video has already been uploaded for this claim.",
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user